Skip to content

Chapter 44. Quotient Spaces and Quotient Operators

Quotient spaces allow vectors that differ by elements of a subspace to be treated as equivalent. They formalize the idea of collapsing a subspace to zero.

If VV is a vector space and UVU\subseteq V is a subspace, the quotient space

V/U V/U

consists of equivalence classes of vectors modulo UU. Quotient operators arise when a linear operator preserves the subspace UU, allowing the operator to act naturally on the quotient space. Quotient constructions are fundamental in linear algebra, abstract algebra, topology, and geometry. (en.wikipedia.org)

44.1 Motivation

Suppose we want to treat vectors that differ by an element of a subspace UU as essentially the same.

For example, in R3\mathbb{R}^3, let

U={[00z]:zR}. U= \left\{ \begin{bmatrix} 0\\ 0\\ z \end{bmatrix} :z\in\mathbb{R} \right\}.

This is the zz-axis.

Two vectors

[x1y1z1],[x2y2z2] \begin{bmatrix} x_1\\ y_1\\ z_1 \end{bmatrix}, \qquad \begin{bmatrix} x_2\\ y_2\\ z_2 \end{bmatrix}

differ by an element of UU exactly when

x1=x2,y1=y2. x_1=x_2, \qquad y_1=y_2.

Thus vectors with the same xx- and yy-coordinates become identified.

The quotient space

R3/U \mathbb{R}^3/U

therefore behaves like the plane R2\mathbb{R}^2. The entire zz-direction has been collapsed.

44.2 Equivalence Relation

Let VV be a vector space and let UVU\subseteq V be a subspace.

Define a relation on VV by

vw v\sim w

if and only if

vwU. v-w\in U.

This is an equivalence relation.

Reflexivity:

vv=0U. v-v=0\in U.

Symmetry:

If

vwU, v-w\in U,

then

wv=(vw)U. w-v=-(v-w)\in U.

Transitivity:

If

vwU v-w\in U

and

wzU, w-z\in U,

then

vz=(vw)+(wz)U. v-z=(v-w)+(w-z)\in U.

Thus vectors are equivalent exactly when their difference lies in UU.

44.3 Cosets

The equivalence class of vVv\in V is

v+U={v+u:uU}. v+U=\{v+u:u\in U\}.

This set is called the coset of UU determined by vv.

The quotient space

V/U V/U

is the set of all cosets:

V/U={v+U:vV}. V/U=\{v+U:v\in V\}.

Each coset is an affine copy of the subspace UU.

Two vectors determine the same coset exactly when they differ by an element of UU:

v+U=w+U    vwU. v+U=w+U \iff v-w\in U.

Thus the quotient space partitions VV into parallel copies of UU.

44.4 Vector Space Structure

The quotient space V/UV/U becomes a vector space by defining addition and scalar multiplication on cosets.

Addition:

(v+U)+(w+U)=(v+w)+U. (v+U)+(w+U)=(v+w)+U.

Scalar multiplication:

c(v+U)=(cv)+U. c(v+U)=(cv)+U.

These definitions must be well-defined. That is, they must not depend on the chosen representatives.

Suppose

v+U=v+U v+U=v'+U

and

w+U=w+U. w+U=w'+U.

Then

vvU,wwU. v-v'\in U, \qquad w-w'\in U.

Therefore

(v+w)(v+w)=(vv)+(ww)U. (v+w)-(v'+w')=(v-v')+(w-w')\in U.

Hence

(v+w)+U=(v+w)+U. (v+w)+U=(v'+w')+U.

Similarly,

cvcv=c(vv)U. cv-cv'=c(v-v')\in U.

So

cv+U=cv+U. cv+U=cv'+U.

Thus the operations are well-defined.

44.5 Zero Element

The zero vector of V/UV/U is

U=0+U. U=0+U.

Indeed,

(v+U)+U=v+U. (v+U)+U=v+U.

A coset equals zero exactly when its representative lies in UU:

v+U=U    vU. v+U=U \iff v\in U.

Thus the subspace UU itself becomes the zero vector in the quotient space.

This is why quotient spaces are often described as collapsing UU to zero.

44.6 Example in R2\mathbb{R}^2

Let

U=span{[10]}. U= \operatorname{span} \left\{ \begin{bmatrix} 1\\ 0 \end{bmatrix} \right\}.

This is the xx-axis.

Two vectors

[x1y1],[x2y2] \begin{bmatrix} x_1\\ y_1 \end{bmatrix}, \qquad \begin{bmatrix} x_2\\ y_2 \end{bmatrix}

belong to the same coset exactly when

y1=y2. y_1=y_2.

Indeed,

[x1y1][x2y2]=[x1x2y1y2] \begin{bmatrix} x_1\\ y_1 \end{bmatrix} - \begin{bmatrix} x_2\\ y_2 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} x_1-x_2\\ y_1-y_2 \end{bmatrix}

lies in UU exactly when

y1y2=0. y_1-y_2=0.

Thus each coset corresponds to a horizontal line.

The quotient space

R2/U \mathbb{R}^2/U

therefore behaves like the yy-axis. The horizontal direction has been collapsed.

44.7 Dimension Formula

If VV is finite-dimensional and UVU\subseteq V, then

dim(V/U)=dim(V)dim(U). \dim(V/U)=\dim(V)-\dim(U).

To prove this, choose a basis

(u1,,uk) (u_1,\ldots,u_k)

for UU, and extend it to a basis of VV:

(u1,,uk,v1,,vm). (u_1,\ldots,u_k,v_1,\ldots,v_m).

Then

dim(V)=k+m. \dim(V)=k+m.

The cosets

v1+U,,vm+U v_1+U,\ldots,v_m+U

form a basis of V/UV/U.

Spanning:

Every vector in VV has the form

u+a1v1++amvm. u+a_1v_1+\cdots+a_mv_m.

Its coset equals

a1(v1+U)++am(vm+U). a_1(v_1+U)+\cdots+a_m(v_m+U).

Linear independence:

If

a1(v1+U)++am(vm+U)=U, a_1(v_1+U)+\cdots+a_m(v_m+U)=U,

then

a1v1++amvmU. a_1v_1+\cdots+a_mv_m\in U.

Since the full list is a basis of VV, this forces

a1==am=0. a_1=\cdots=a_m=0.

Thus

dim(V/U)=m=dim(V)dim(U). \dim(V/U)=m=\dim(V)-\dim(U).

This is the dimension formula for quotient spaces. (math.libretexts.org)

44.8 Canonical Projection

The canonical projection map is

π:VV/U,π(v)=v+U. \pi:V\to V/U, \qquad \pi(v)=v+U.

This map sends each vector to its coset.

The map π\pi is linear:

π(v+w)=(v+w)+U=(v+U)+(w+U), \pi(v+w)=(v+w)+U=(v+U)+(w+U),

and

π(cv)=cv+U=c(v+U). \pi(cv)=cv+U=c(v+U).

The kernel of π\pi is

ker(π)=U. \ker(\pi)=U.

Indeed,

π(v)=U \pi(v)=U

exactly when

vU. v\in U.

The image of π\pi is all of V/UV/U.

Thus π\pi is a surjective linear map with kernel UU.

44.9 First Isomorphism Theorem

Let

T:VW T:V\to W

be linear.

Then

V/ker(T)im(T). V/\ker(T)\cong \operatorname{im}(T).

This is the first isomorphism theorem for vector spaces.

Define

Φ:V/ker(T)im(T) \Phi:V/\ker(T)\to \operatorname{im}(T)

by

Φ(v+ker(T))=T(v). \Phi(v+\ker(T))=T(v).

This is well-defined because if

v+ker(T)=w+ker(T), v+\ker(T)=w+\ker(T),

then

vwker(T), v-w\in \ker(T),

so

T(vw)=0, T(v-w)=0,

hence

T(v)=T(w). T(v)=T(w).

The map is linear, surjective, and injective. Therefore it is an isomorphism.

This theorem shows that quotient spaces naturally arise from linear maps.

44.10 Quotient Operators

Let

T:VV T:V\to V

be linear, and let UVU\subseteq V be invariant under TT.

Then TT induces a linear operator on the quotient space:

T~:V/UV/U, \widetilde{T}:V/U\to V/U,

defined by

T~(v+U)=T(v)+U. \widetilde{T}(v+U)=T(v)+U.

This is called the quotient operator induced by TT.

The invariance of UU is essential. Without it, the definition may not be well-defined.

44.11 Why Invariance Is Needed

Suppose

v+U=w+U. v+U=w+U.

Then

vwU. v-w\in U.

To show the quotient operator is well-defined, we need

T(v)+U=T(w)+U. T(v)+U=T(w)+U.

This means

T(v)T(w)U. T(v)-T(w)\in U.

But

T(v)T(w)=T(vw). T(v)-T(w)=T(v-w).

So we need

T(vw)U T(v-w)\in U

whenever

vwU. v-w\in U.

This is exactly the condition

T(U)U. T(U)\subseteq U.

Thus quotient operators exist precisely when the subspace is invariant.

44.12 Example of a Quotient Operator

Let

T:R2R2 T:\mathbb{R}^2\to\mathbb{R}^2

be defined by

T[xy]=[x+yy]. T \begin{bmatrix} x\\ y \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} x+y\\ y \end{bmatrix}.

Its matrix is

A=[1101]. A= \begin{bmatrix} 1&1\\ 0&1 \end{bmatrix}.

Let

U=span{[10]}. U= \operatorname{span} \left\{ \begin{bmatrix} 1\\ 0 \end{bmatrix} \right\}.

Then UU is invariant because

T[x0]=[x0]. T \begin{bmatrix} x\\ 0 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} x\\ 0 \end{bmatrix}.

The quotient space V/UV/U behaves like the yy-axis.

Now

T[xy]=[x+yy]. T \begin{bmatrix} x\\ y \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} x+y\\ y \end{bmatrix}.

Modulo UU, the first coordinate disappears. Thus the quotient operator acts by

yy. y\mapsto y.

So the induced operator on V/UV/U is the identity.

44.13 Matrix Form of a Quotient Operator

Suppose UVU\subseteq V is invariant under TT.

Choose a basis

(u1,,uk,v1,,vm) (u_1,\ldots,u_k,v_1,\ldots,v_m)

such that

(u1,,uk) (u_1,\ldots,u_k)

is a basis of UU.

Then the matrix of TT has block upper triangular form

[AB0C]. \begin{bmatrix} A&B\\ 0&C \end{bmatrix}.

The block AA represents the restriction of TT to UU.

The block CC represents the quotient operator on V/UV/U.

Thus quotient operators naturally appear inside block triangular decompositions.

44.14 Quotient by the Kernel

Let

T:VW T:V\to W

be linear.

The quotient space

V/ker(T) V/\ker(T)

removes exactly the directions invisible to TT.

Indeed, vectors vv and ww lie in the same coset exactly when

vwker(T). v-w\in \ker(T).

This means

T(v)=T(w). T(v)=T(w).

Thus the quotient identifies vectors that have the same image under TT.

The first isomorphism theorem says that after collapsing the kernel, the map becomes injective.

44.15 Quotient Spaces and Geometry

Quotient spaces often reduce dimension by ignoring selected directions.

Examples:

Original spaceSubspace collapsedQuotient behaves like
R3\mathbb{R}^3zz-axisR2\mathbb{R}^2
R2\mathbb{R}^2xx-axisR\mathbb{R}
Polynomial spaceMultiples of x2x^2Lower-degree polynomials

The quotient construction keeps only information transverse to the chosen subspace.

44.16 Quotient and Direct Sum

Suppose

V=UW. V=U\oplus W.

Then every vector can be written uniquely as

u+w. u+w.

In this case,

V/UW. V/U\cong W.

Indeed, every coset has a unique representative in WW.

Define

Φ:WV/U \Phi:W\to V/U

by

Φ(w)=w+U. \Phi(w)=w+U.

This map is linear, injective, and surjective.

Thus quotient spaces are closely related to complementary subspaces.

However, quotient spaces do not require a chosen complement. The quotient construction works even when no natural complement exists.

44.17 Quotient Spaces and Duality

If UVU\subseteq V, then functionals vanishing on UU correspond naturally to linear functionals on V/UV/U.

Indeed, if

f:VF f:V\to F

satisfies

f(u)=0 f(u)=0

for every uUu\in U, then ff depends only on the coset v+Uv+U.

Thus there exists a unique functional

f~:V/UF \widetilde{f}:V/U\to F

such that

f~(v+U)=f(v). \widetilde{f}(v+U)=f(v).

This connection is important in dual spaces, annihilators, and functional analysis.

44.18 Quotient and Polynomial Operators

Suppose UU is invariant under TT. Then every polynomial in TT also induces a quotient operator.

Indeed,

p(T)(v+U)=p(T)(v)+U. p(T)(v+U)=p(T)(v)+U.

This is well-defined because invariance under TT implies invariance under every power of TT, and therefore under every polynomial in TT.

Thus quotient constructions are compatible with operator algebra.

44.19 Quotient Spaces in Module Theory

Quotient spaces are vector-space versions of quotient modules and quotient groups.

The construction always has the same form:

  1. Choose a substructure.
  2. Declare elements differing by that substructure to be equivalent.
  3. Form equivalence classes.
  4. Define induced operations.

In vector spaces, the substructure is a subspace. In groups, it is a normal subgroup. In rings, it is an ideal.

The linear-algebra quotient construction is therefore part of a broader algebraic pattern.

44.20 Quotient Spaces and Coordinates

Suppose

V=UW. V=U\oplus W.

Then every vector has coordinates

(u,w). (u,w).

Passing to the quotient V/UV/U removes the UU-coordinates and keeps only the WW-coordinates.

This viewpoint explains why quotient spaces often behave like complementary subspaces, even though no complement is built into the definition.

The quotient remembers only directions not absorbed into UU.

44.21 Universal Property

The quotient map

π:VV/U \pi:V\to V/U

has the following universal property.

If

T:VW T:V\to W

is linear and

Uker(T), U\subseteq \ker(T),

then there exists a unique linear map

T~:V/UW \widetilde{T}:V/U\to W

such that

T=T~π. T=\widetilde{T}\circ \pi.

Diagrammatically,

VπV/UT~W. V \overset{\pi}{\longrightarrow} V/U \overset{\widetilde{T}}{\longrightarrow} W.

This property characterizes the quotient space abstractly and explains why quotient constructions appear naturally throughout algebra.

44.22 Summary

Let UVU\subseteq V be a subspace.

The quotient space

V/U V/U

consists of cosets

v+U. v+U.

Two vectors are identified when their difference lies in UU.

The quotient space has vector operations

(v+U)+(w+U)=(v+w)+U (v+U)+(w+U)=(v+w)+U

and

c(v+U)=cv+U. c(v+U)=cv+U.

Its dimension satisfies

dim(V/U)=dim(V)dim(U). \dim(V/U)=\dim(V)-\dim(U).

The canonical projection

π:VV/U \pi:V\to V/U

has kernel UU.

If T:VVT:V\to V preserves UU, then TT induces a quotient operator

T~:V/UV/U. \widetilde{T}:V/U\to V/U.

Quotient spaces formalize the idea of collapsing a subspace to zero. They are fundamental in linear algebra, operator theory, geometry, algebra, and topology.