IMO 2010 Shortlist N11

. Same as Problem N1, but the constant is replaced by . (Canada) Answer for Problem N1. n 39. Solution for Problem N1. ...

IMO 2010 Shortlist N11

Category: Number Theory

Problem

. Same as Problem N1, but the constant is replaced by . (Canada) Answer for Problem N1. n 39. Solution for Problem N1. Suppose that for some n there exist the desired numbers; we may assume that s1 s2  sn. Surely s1 ¡ 1 since otherwise 1  1 s1  0. So we have 2 ¨s1 ¨s2 1 ¨¨sn pn 1q, hence si ©i 1 for each i 1,...,n. Therefore   1  1 s1  1  1 s2 ...  1  1 sn ©  1  1  1  1 ...  1  1 n 1  1  2  n n 1  1 n 1 , which implies n 1 © 2010  670 ¡39, so n ©39. Now we are left to show that n  39 fits. Consider the set t2,3,...,33,35,36,...,40,67u which contains exactly 39 numbers. We have  2 32  34 39  66  1  34  66  17  51 , p1q hence for n 39 there exists a desired example. Comment. One can show that the example p1q is unique. Answer for Problem N11. n 48. Solution for Problem N11. Suppose that for some n there exist the desired numbers. In the same way we obtain that si © i 1. Moreover, since the denominator of the fraction  7 is divisible by 67, some of si’s should be divisible by 67, so sn © si © 67. This means that © 1  2 n 1 n   1  1  66 67n , 65 which implies n © 2010 66 42 67  330 ¡47, so n ©48. Now we are left to show that n  48 fits. Consider the set t2,3,...,33,36,37,...,50,67u which contains exactly 48 numbers. We have  2 32  35 49  66  1  35  66  7  42 , hence for n 48 there exists a desired example. Comment 1. In this version of the problem, the estimate needs one more step, hence it is a bit harder. On the other hand, the example in this version is not unique. Another example is  2 46  66  329  1  66  329  7 67 5  42 . Comment 2. N11 was the Proposer’s formulation of the problem. We propose N1 according to the number of current IMO. 66