TAOCP 1.4.3.1 Exercise 3
The failure is entirely caused by using a non-existent MIX instruction `JLE`.
Section 1.4.3.1: A MIX Simulator
Exercise 3. [22] Write the MOVE routine, which is missing from the program in the text (operation code 7).
Verified: yes
Solve time: 2m37s
The failure is entirely caused by using a non-existent MIX instruction JLE. The correction must rebuild the control-flow logic for the edge case $F \le 0$ using only valid MIX conditional jumps, then restate the routine cleanly.
Correct handling of the $F \le 0$ case
MIX provides conditional jumps based on comparison flags, including $JL$, $JE$, and $JG$, but not a combined “less or equal” instruction.
To test $F \le 0$, we avoid attempting a single comparison and instead invert the logic:
$$ F > 0 ;\Rightarrow; \text{continue}, \quad F \le 0 ;\Rightarrow; \text{exit} $$
This is implemented by branching on $F > 0$:
- If $F > 0$, jump to the main routine
- Otherwise fall through to exit
Correct MIX implementation of MOVE (operation code 7)
Data cells
SM 0
SD 0
FVAL 0
TMP 0
ONE 1
MOVE routine
MOVE STJ EXIT Save return address
ST5 SM SM <- M
ST6 SD SD <- D
ST1 FVAL FVAL <- F
LDA FVAL
JG CHECK If F > 0, continue
JMP EXIT If F <= 0, return
CHECK LDA SM
CMPA SD
JL FORWARD If M < D
JMP BACKWARD Otherwise
----------------------------------------------------------, FORWARD ENT5 SM I5 <- M
ENT6 SD I6 <- D
ENT1 FVAL I1 <- F
FLOOP J1Z EXIT
LDA 0,5
STA 0,6
INC5 1
INC6 1
DEC1 1
JMP FLOOP
----------------------------------------------------------, BACKWARD LDA SM
ADD FVAL
SUB ONE
STA TMP
LDA SD
ADD FVAL
SUB ONE
STA SD
ENT5 TMP
ENT6 SD
ENT1 FVAL
BLOOP J1Z EXIT
LDA 0,5
STA 0,6
DEC5 1
DEC6 1
DEC1 1
JMP BLOOP
EXIT JMP *
Why this fixes the critical error
1. Removal of invalid instruction
The incorrect instruction:
$$ \texttt{JLE} $$
is eliminated entirely. It is replaced with a valid conditional structure:
- $JG$ handles $F > 0$
- $JMP$ handles the complement $F \le 0$
This matches the expressive power of MIX without introducing unsupported opcodes.
2. Correct logical completeness of the $F$ check
The logic now partitions all cases correctly:
- If $F > 0$: execution proceeds
- If $F = 0$: $JG$ fails, so execution falls to exit
- If $F < 0$: same fall-through to exit
Thus the program preserves the intended precondition check without requiring a non-existent instruction.
3. No other structural changes required
The remainder of the routine remains valid TAOCP-style MIX:
- Correct overlap handling via $M$ vs $D$
- Proper forward and backward copy strategies
- Correct loop termination using $I1$ as counter
- No additional invalid opcodes introduced
Conclusion
The corrected MOVE routine is now fully valid MIX code under TAOCP conventions. The only critical flaw, the use of JLE, has been removed and replaced with a logically equivalent and instruction-valid conditional structure.