Kvant Math Problem 298

For $m=5$ the consecutive fractions

Verified: no
Verdicts: SKIP + SKIP
Solve time: 6m30s
Source on kvant.digital

Problem

List all irreducible fractions $\dfrac pq$, where $0\lt p\lt q\le m$, in ascending order ($m$ is a given natural number). For example, for $m=5$ the sequence $$\dfrac15,\quad\dfrac14,\quad\dfrac13,\quad\dfrac25,\quad\dfrac12,\quad\dfrac35,\quad\dfrac23,\quad\dfrac34,\quad\dfrac45.$$ is obtained. Prove that for any two consecutive fractions $\dfrac pq\lt\dfrac rs$ in such a sequence, the equality $qr-ps=1$ holds.

N. B. Vasilyev

Exploration

For $m=5$ the consecutive fractions

$$\frac13<\frac25,\qquad \frac25<\frac12,\qquad \frac23<\frac34$$

satisfy

$$3\cdot2-1\cdot5=1,\qquad 5\cdot1-2\cdot2=1,\qquad 3\cdot3-2\cdot4=1.$$

The statement resembles the classical property of neighboring fractions in a Farey sequence.

Suppose $\frac pq<\frac rs$ are consecutive fractions. Then

$$qr-ps>0.$$

Since $p,q,r,s$ are integers, $qr-ps$ is a positive integer. To prove it equals $1$, it suffices to rule out the possibility $qr-ps\ge2$.

If $qr-ps\ge2$, one should try to construct another reduced fraction between $\frac pq$ and $\frac rs$ whose denominator does not exceed $m$. The obvious candidate is the mediant

$$\frac{p+r}{q+s},$$

which always lies strictly between the two fractions. The difficulty is that its denominator may exceed $m$.

The crucial point is therefore: from the assumption $qr-ps\ge2$, produce some fraction between $\frac pq$ and $\frac rs$ with denominator at most $m$.

Assume $q\ge s$. Consider the integers

$$p+kr,\qquad q+ks.$$

For

$$k=\left\lfloor \frac{m-q}{s}\right\rfloor$$

the denominator $q+ks$ does not exceed $m$, while $q+(k+1)s>m$. Put

$$a=p+kr,\qquad b=q+ks.$$

Then

$$\frac pq<\frac ab<\frac rs.$$

Indeed,

$$aq-bp=k(qr-ps)>0,$$

and

$$rb-sa=qr-ps>0.$$

Now $b+s>m$. Hence

$$b>m-s\ge q-s.$$

Since $b=q+ks$, this gives $(k+1)s>m-q$, exactly as required. The remaining issue is to show that $\frac ab$ can be reduced to a fraction whose denominator is still at most $m$. Any reduction only decreases the denominator. Thus a reduced fraction between $\frac pq$ and $\frac rs$ would exist, contradicting consecutiveness. This yields $qr-ps=1$.

The step most likely to hide an error is proving that $\frac ab$ lies strictly between the given fractions and that its denominator indeed does not exceed $m$.

Problem Understanding

We are given all reduced fractions $\frac pq$ satisfying

$$0<p<q\le m,$$

arranged in increasing order. We must prove that whenever two fractions

$$\frac pq<\frac rs$$

appear consecutively in this ordered list, they satisfy

$$qr-ps=1.$$

This is a Type B problem, a pure proof.

The core difficulty is to show that if $qr-ps$ were at least $2$, then another reduced fraction with denominator at most $m$ would necessarily lie between the two given fractions, contradicting their consecutiveness.

Proof Architecture

The first lemma states that if integers $a,b$ satisfy

$$aq-bp>0,$$

then $\frac ab>\frac pq$, and if

$$rb-sa>0,$$

then $\frac ab<\frac rs$; this is just cross multiplication with positive denominators.

The second lemma states that, assuming $q\ge s$, if

$$k=\left\lfloor \frac{m-q}{s}\right\rfloor,$$

and

$$a=p+kr,\qquad b=q+ks,$$

then $b\le m$; this follows directly from the definition of the floor function.

The third lemma states that if $qr-ps\ge2$, then the fraction $\frac ab$ constructed above lies strictly between $\frac pq$ and $\frac rs$; the required inequalities reduce to positive multiples of $qr-ps$.

The final step shows that reducing $\frac ab$ to lowest terms produces a reduced fraction between $\frac pq$ and $\frac rs$ whose denominator is still at most $m$, contradicting the assumption that the two fractions are consecutive.

The hardest part is the construction of the intermediate fraction with denominator at most $m$.

Solution

Let

$$\frac pq<\frac rs$$

be two consecutive fractions in the ordered list of all irreducible fractions satisfying

$$0<p<q\le m.$$

Since

$$\frac pq<\frac rs,$$

we have

$$qr-ps>0.$$

The quantity $qr-ps$ is an integer, so it is enough to prove that the possibility

$$qr-ps\ge2$$

is impossible.

Assume, for contradiction, that

$$qr-ps\ge2.$$

Interchanging the two fractions if necessary, we may suppose that

$$q\ge s.$$

Define

$$k=\left\lfloor\frac{m-q}{s}\right\rfloor,$$

and set

$$a=p+kr,\qquad b=q+ks.$$

From the definition of $k$,

$$q+ks\le m,$$

hence

$$b\le m.$$

Consider the fraction $\frac ab$.

First,

$$aq-bp=(p+kr)q-(q+ks)p =k(qr-ps).$$

Since $k\ge0$ and $qr-ps>0$, we obtain

$$aq-bp>0.$$

Therefore

$$\frac pq<\frac ab.$$

Next,

$$rb-sa=r(q+ks)-s(p+kr) =qr-ps.$$

Since $qr-ps>0$,

$$rb-sa>0,$$

and consequently

$$\frac ab<\frac rs.$$

Thus

$$\frac pq<\frac ab<\frac rs.$$

Let

$$d=\gcd(a,b).$$

Reducing $\frac ab$ to lowest terms gives

$$\frac{a/d}{b/d}.$$

Its denominator is $b/d\le b\le m$. Since reduction does not change the value of the fraction,

$$\frac pq<\frac{a/d}{b/d}<\frac rs.$$

Hence we have found an irreducible fraction with denominator at most $m$ lying strictly between $\frac pq$ and $\frac rs$.

This contradicts the assumption that $\frac pq$ and $\frac rs$ are consecutive fractions in the ordered list.

The contradiction shows that the assumption $qr-ps\ge2$ is false. Since $qr-ps$ is a positive integer, the only remaining possibility is

$$qr-ps=1.$$

This completes the proof.

Verification of Key Steps

The first delicate point is the inequality

$$\frac pq<\frac ab.$$

Substituting $a=p+kr$ and $b=q+ks$ gives

$$aq-bp=k(qr-ps).$$

A careless computation may incorrectly produce $(k+1)(qr-ps)$. The exact expansion is

$$(p+kr)q-(q+ks)p = pq+kqr-pq-kps = k(qr-ps),$$

which is positive because $k\ge0$ and $qr-ps>0$.

The second delicate point is the proof that $b\le m$. From

$$k=\left\lfloor\frac{m-q}{s}\right\rfloor$$

we obtain

$$k\le\frac{m-q}{s}.$$

Multiplying by $s$ and adding $q$ yields

$$q+ks\le m.$$

This is exactly the denominator bound required by the problem.

The third delicate point is the passage to lowest terms. If

$$\frac ab=\frac{a/d}{b/d},$$

the denominator becomes smaller, not larger. Hence

$$\frac{b}{d}\le b\le m.$$

The reduced fraction remains between $\frac pq$ and $\frac rs$ because it has the same numerical value as $\frac ab$.

Alternative Approaches

A classical Farey-sequence argument proceeds by contradiction in a different way. Assume consecutive fractions satisfy $qr-ps\ge2$. Then one chooses an integer denominator $t\le m$ maximizing the value of a fraction between $\frac pq$ and $\frac rs$ with denominator $t$, and studies the corresponding numerator. Elementary inequalities then produce another fraction between the two with a larger denominator, contradicting maximality. This eventually forces $qr-ps=1$.

Another approach uses the theory of mediants. Neighboring fractions in a Farey sequence are characterized by the determinant condition $qr-ps=1$. If $qr-ps>1$, repeated mediant constructions generate a reduced fraction strictly between them. A suitable choice of mediant in the Stern-Brocot tree yields a denominator not exceeding $m$, contradicting consecutiveness. The proof given above is preferable because it avoids any external theory and derives the needed intermediate fraction directly from elementary arithmetic.